Search for:
  • Home/
  • Food/
  • 12 catering companies in Chaoyang District, Wallace and other Beijing Chaoyang District were punished for food safety issues

12 catering companies in Chaoyang District, Wallace and other Beijing Chaoyang District were punished for food safety issues

On April 19, the WeChat public account of the Beijing Consumer Association issued a notification. In the special rectification work of the “Catering Food Safety Inspection” of the Chaoyang District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, 12 catering companies including Beijing Wallace Catering Management Co., Ltd.There are problems such as environmental hygiene and disinfection and disinfection.

Details are as follows:

1. Beijing Yue Fan Er Catering Management Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem of unqualified disinfection and disinfection of catering utensils.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 56 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (5) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order it to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

2. Beijing Xiaosha Jinhai Catering Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had problems that some food production and operators did not obtain a health certificate.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 45 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (6) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

3. Beijing Xiaodao Catering Service Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem of not obtaining a health certificate and failure to conduct food storage, transportation, and loading and unloading as required.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 45 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (6) and 132 of Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order it to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

4. Beijing Weimeon Fragrant Catering Management Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties existing in the homepage of online catering service business activities to publicize food business license information was not updated in time.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 9 of the “Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Food Safety in Network Catering Services”.In accordance with Article 32 of the “Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Food Safety Supervision of Online Catering,”, it is ordered to make corrections and gives warning administrative penalties.

5. Beijing Lao Xianju Catering Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem that the parties did not establish a food purchase inspection record system in accordance with regulations.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 53 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (3) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

6. Beijing Keyou Beauty Catering Center

The inspection found that the parties had changes in production and operation conditions that did not deal with them in accordance with regulations.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 47 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (11) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

7. Beijing Digging Catering Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problems of inspection and evaluation of food safety status and changes in production and operation conditions that did not deal with them in accordance with regulations.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 47 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (11) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

8. Beijing Music Food Hui Catering Service Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had problems that did not formulate and implement the control requirements of the production and operation process in accordance with regulations.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 46, paragraph 1 (2) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

9. Beijing Stone Restaurant Management Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem of environmental hygiene.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 33 (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

10. Beijing Shared Kitchen Catering Management Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem of environmental hygiene.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 33 (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

11. Beijing Royal Face King Catering Co., Ltd.

The inspection found that the parties had the problem of environmental hygiene.The behavior of the parties was suspected of violating the provisions of Article 33 (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.In accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1 (13) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, or order to make corrections and give warning administrative penalties.

12. Beijing Wallass Catering Management Co., Ltd.